Skip to main content

Mobile Ads

Lootcase movie review: Harmless, predictable timepass with an aam aadmi and dirty cash

It is unlikely that anyone has ever experienced such joy outside a Sulabh Sauchalaya as Nandan Kumar did that night - when a film kicks off with these words after its middle-class hero finds cash stashed away at the entrance of a public toilet, it holds out a promise of the sort of impertinent humour Hindi cinema rarely does. Black comedy is a genre Bollywood has not often visited or had much success with. In that sense, for those looking for something out of the ordinary from this film industry, writer-director Rajesh Krishnan's Lootcase sets itself up well.

Not that the opening plot point is novel: just last month, for instance, Netflix released director Anurag Kashyap's Choked: Paisa Bolta Hai, that was about a middle-class housewife who finds bundles of cash floating up out of the drain below her kitchen sink. Still, Lootcase offers hope that it might have something new to say with the blend of laughter, suspense and menace in its early scenes. (Note: Kashyap was in poor form with Choked - that is a separate discussion.)

Nandan works at a printing press in Mumbai and lives in seedy, cramped quarters with his disgruntled wife and demanding son. One night when he chances upon a suitcase filled with Rs 2,000 notes, he sees a way out of his daily drudgery.

Kunal Kemmu in a still from Lootcase. YouTube

Nandan is honest in the way human beings tend to be when they have never had an opportunity to be dishonest. So, he suffers from pangs of conscience and the fear of being found out. While he deals with his dilemmas, in another part of town, the politician to whom this money belongs sets off a chain of events involving his sidekicks, a rival gangster and a dirty cop.

This is the sort of territory Kashyap, when at his best, and the Ram Gopal Varma Who Once Was have thrived on over the years. Immoral and amoral folk caught in a vortex of circumstances beyond the control of even the person who started it all, the domino effect of violence and corruption, and the pointlessness of it all - both gentlemen have operated in these areas with glee and to spectacular effect at various points in time.

Each major player in Lootcase is an eccentric in their own right. Nandan (Kunal Kemmu) who aspires to win "Employee of the Month" at work, his wife (Rasika Dugal) who can't be bothered with social niceties around her neighbours, their dirty talk pinned on Chinese food, their precocious child, the gangsta (Vijay Raaz) obsessed with National Geographic and borrowing life lessons from the wild, the neta (Gajraj Rao) who issues sugar-coated threats that he insists are not threats, the corrupt cop (Ranvir Shorey) who requests a cup of tea from the wives of men he is about to kill - each of these is brimming with potential.

The screenplay fails to build on these quirky elements though. Having cast a bunch of fine actors - including Kemmu who really deserves better than what Bollywood has given him so far, Dugal who has been so fantastic in films like Qissa and Manto, and Raaz whose filmography stretches from Monsoon Wedding to Delhi Belly and Dream Girl - and having got the narrative off to a good start, co-writers Kapil Sawant and Krishnan himself are unable to come up with much.

The humour in Lootcase soon becomes sparse, the occasional wisecrack/misunderstanding can be seen coming from a mile and the pace slackens. The narrative's lack of urgency is its undoing.

Not that Lootcase is terrible - not at all. It is half done, but it is also well begun. It is predicable, but it is also harmless. If you are in an undemanding mood, then it is not a bad film to spend your time on.


by Anna MM Vetticad

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Oscars 2021 adds in-person UK hub for international nominees amid travel concerns during pandemic

With less than a month until showtime, the 93rd Oscars are taking another pass at the script. Show producers Steven Soderbergh, Jesse Collins and Stacey Sher remain determined to have an i n-person ceremony on 25 April in Los Angeles but told nominees on Tuesday in a virtual meeting that they’ve added a British hub after some backlash from nominees about international travel restrictions. The main event will still take place at Los Angeles’ Union station which will include a red carpet component but they are planning something special for the UK location. The show is also working with local broadcast affiliates around the world to provide satellite links for other international nominees. They said they are not totally ruling out Zoom but are hoping it doesn’t come to that. Although plans and requirements remain fluid, attendees have been told they’re expected to quarantine for 10 days prior to the show. And everyone is being told to bring a mask, even if the show is being designed...

Nayanthara, Vignesh Shivan to marry on 9 June; here's all you need to know

Filmmaker Vignesh Shivan and Nayanthara are all set to get married tomorrow, 9 June. Shivan made an announcement about the same on Tuesday, 7 June in an interaction with the media. Talking about their wedding venue, Shivan informed that the wedding will take place at a private resort in Mahabalipuram . Shivan also spoke about the change in the wedding venue from Tirupati to Mahabalipuram. The filmmaker said that the couple wanted to get married in a temple but due to issues in logistics, it was difficult to bring their families to Tirupati. So, they decided to change the wedding venue to Mahabalipuram. He added that the wedding will be attended by close friends and family members. The rumours regarding their wedding began after the duo was clicked with Tamil Nadu Chief Minister MK Stalin and reports claimed that the couple had gone to invite the Chief Minister for their special day. Nayanthara and Vignesh Shivan had met each other in 2015 for the first time during the nar...

In conversation with Christopher Doyle, cinematographer of Wong Kar-Wai cinema: How we react to spaces energizes the film

The New Yorker critic Anthony Lane described the cinematography of Christopher Doyle as “a snake — savouring the air of the streets.” Across the Atlantic Ocean, on BBC , he is credited with “changing the look of cinema”. Doyle’s “anti-Hollywood” aesthetic, associated with the streaks of thick, luminous paint in Wong Kar-wai’s films, have a striking and lasting visual vitality. It has often been described as “post-modern” — though what that means exactly is everybody’s guess. My guess is the reliance, in his images, on feelings over narrative, on style over substance — the kind that skyrocketed post-World War II artists like Mark Rothko into fame. Rothko would just paint fields of colour, and people would stand and weep in front of his large, enveloping canvases. The effect of Doyle’s imagery is not much different.  For all his artistry, Doyle is flippant, moony, and charming. During an e-mail exchange produced below, edited for length and clarity, Doyle warns, “I think you s...