Skip to main content

Mobile Ads

Lol: Enga Siri Papom review — A drought of humour

Language: Tamil

The Tamil nation is at an unfortunate time in its history — its popular culture and commercial ventures are living through a horrific drought of humour.

2021 Tamil nation is filled with Vadivelu memes and Vivek nostalgia, both of whom were past their prime at least a decade ago. The casual comedy of reality television — I'm looking at you, Vijay TV — is firmly built on insulting the women in the room. Self-deprecation of anchors like DD, Priyanka and Archana only adds fuel to the fire. Netflix's Navarasa interprets the rasa of humour through a body-shaming, casteist, classist, and arguably unfunny, film. The independent comedy scene including stand-up comedy, sketch comedy etc. is primarily populated by urban, Brahmin men.

The latest entry into this universe, Amazon Prime's latest release, LOL: Enge Siri Paappom brings together the worst of all this. LOL is a reality show, where comedians are locked in a room for six hours. They need to make their competitors laugh, without themselves ever laughing. 'You laugh, you lose' is the rule.

Late comedian Vivek and actor Shiva play the hosts. Cinema personalities like Premji, Sathish and Powerstar Srinivasan; TV comedians like RJ Vignesh, Pugazh and Harathi; and stand-up comics Abhishek Kumar, Baggy and Syama Harini join the coterie. Also with them is theatre artist and actor Maya S. Vivek and Shiva are kind. They are, in fact, unreasonably paternal in encouraging the participants. They act as the manual laughter track. If you ever wonder whether something you saw/heard was a joke, the producers cut helpfully to Vivek and Shiva. You will find them laughing, but don't doubt yourself, it was not a joke. It helps that they both seem genuinely enthusiastic about what they've signed up for.

lol

The contestants are a strange lot. The group is not homogenous enough to elevate each other. None of these contestants naturally gravitate towards another for some fun riffing or even a collaborative show. Not that they don't try. For instance, Syama Harini lays her eyes on Premji as her comedic partner during her unmarriageable woman act (the act itself is cringe-worthy, but I'll come to it). But Premji does not embrace her attempts at all; if anything, he is only shying away from her. It gets so bad at one point that she says, "anyone who takes my coffee is my husband." Spoiler alert: No one drinks her coffee. So she changes costume and moves on.

This also happens when Maya S Krishnan wears a bodybuilder costume and tries to improvise with Pugazh, who is dressed as a woman. But he doesn't seem to catch her intent at all. In fact, I got a feeling that many contestants thought of LOL as Bigg Boss, where they need to survive the six hours, instead of as a show where they need to make their competitors and audiences laugh. Premji, for instance, doesn't even try.

This is perhaps because LOL demands improvisation skills from a group of comedians, a majority of whom are used to doing scripted work. They don't seem to be able to build something entirely new from thin air. But the problem is that, even when given the chance to give a scripted performance, they rely on their non-existent improvisation skills. For instance, during his performance time, Powerstar Srinivasan wears a Cleopatra costume and dances seductively. Soon enough, Pugazh too wears a nighty and a wig, and speaks in a high-pitched voice — did I miss the memo that just being a woman is funny?

The show is so barren of any heterogeneity that the same jokes are made by multiple people multiple times.

For instance, they all rhyme Maya with Aaya (old woman). In fact, when Maya dresses as an old woman, both Shiva and Vivek look at each other and go, "Maya-vaAaya-vaahahaha" as if they're delighted that a situation arrived for that joke in their head!

Harathi asks Premji if no one respects him, which is why he's added 'Ji' to his name — poor Premji looked so exhausted by that! Pugazh mentions "Gandhiji Nehruji Premji" twice as if the first time wasn't painful enough. Then, of course, there are the in-jokes. Everyone mocks Premji for being "forever single". Someone mentions STR at some point (if you don't know who it is or why, I'm jealous of you.)

Lol 640

The show doesn't set them up in great humorous situations either. The tiebreaker is designed as a thumb fight during which the contestants can insult each other as much as they want. You will be stunned at how little creativity they exhibit. I've been in minor road accidents where I've heard more colourful and creative language. The game where two contestants are expected to speak in diametrically opposite dialects is mostly a mess. The absolute lack of control that Harathi and Pugazh exercise over their words and work is explicit. That skit felt a little like a drunken fight — uninhibited, maybe, but out of control certainly.

As if the producers knew this was going to be bad, they give contestants props and costumes. But, can costume make up for the lack of creativity? If self-deprecating fat-shaming jokes are all you've got, can you think beyond Sumo Wrestler fat-suit or a gorilla costume? Harathi chooses exactly these and you can guess how that ended!

Syama Harini doesn't go the same route in an obvious way. But her unmarriageable woman act is bizarre. Serving bad coffee or pestering men to marry you is funny? Would it be unreasonable for the audience to see an underlying joke about her physical appearance in that act? Abishek Kumar acts as a journalist from "ThooTimes," the nomenclature his only joke. If you've seen the trailer, you've got everything money can buy from him.

LOL is a show where Sathish is the funniest of them all, at least he owns the "counter-giving" game, the insult comedy that the Tamil nation savours. If Sathish is the best they've got, Amazon Prime is truly scraping the bottom of the barrel.

The telling thing about LOL: Enge Siri Paapom is that most people who are eliminated leave because they laughed at their own jokes. Perhaps, the show is a lesson on self-love. If you're a friend or a follower, let me show you some love, skip this show and find something better to do with your time.

Watch the trailer here:


by Ranjani Krishnakumar

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch The Sound with Mark Ronson Apple TV+ explores the curious link between music and technology

In The Salmon of Doubt , Douglas Adams writes: “I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies: 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary, and is just a natural part of the way the world works. 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re 15 and 35 is new and exciting and revolutionary, and you can probably get a career in it. 3. Anything invented after you're 35 is against the natural order of things.” Cut to the world of music. As much as technology has been a driving force in the industry, the advent of any innovation has often been received with skepticism before it goes on to become the norm. Harnessing that interplay between the creative process of making music and the technological enhancement given to said music, is acclaimed DJ and producer Mark Ronson. In his just-released six-part mini-docuseries Watch the Sound with Mark Ronson , he astutely defines how different the process of creating a great

Studying women presidents and prime ministers on screen, from Meryl Streep in Don't Look Up to Dimple Kapadia in A Thursday

In 2016, when I heard Hillary Clinton had lost the US Presidential race to Donald Trump, I took it as a confirmation that this is how much the US hated its women. And I felt temporarily gratified to live in a country which elected a woman as its third prime minister. This was before I remembered Indira Gandhi was the only woman prime minister we have had, and she was an outlier. Her strong and uncompromising leadership style skews meaningful analysis of gender representation in governance. Anyway, for all the breaking of paths and glass ceilings, trailblazers like Gandhi and Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher commonly belong to conservative or traditional parties. Left to the simultaneously imaginative and mimetic art of comedy, the first woman US president looks like Meryl Streep’s Janine Orlean in Don’t Look Up and Julia Louis Dreyfus’ Selina Meyer in the HBO show Veep . They are both are anti-feminists and women of power. Yet they could not be more different in how they reflect the r

Netflix's Lupin acknowledges dangers of fantasies of omnipotence, introducing viewers to a socially conscious gentleman thief

By Emma Bielecki Netflix’s immensely successful new French-language show Lupin has introduced a new generation of anglophone viewers to one of the most popular characters in French popular fiction, Arsène Lupin, gentleman thief. Lupin was created in 1905 by the writer Maurice Leblanc at the behest of publisher Pierre Lafitte, who had recently launched a general interest magazine, Je Sais Tout . Lafitte wanted a serial that would guarantee a loyal readership for his magazine, as the Sherlock Holmes stories had for the Strand Magazine. Drawing inspiration from Conan Doyle and EW Hornung’s Raffles stories, Leblanc obliged by creating a flamboyant and ultimately always benign trickster figure. Cat burglar, con artist, master of disguise, Lupin is also a brilliant detective and righter of wrongs. His appeal has proved enduring: in addition to the original 20 volumes of stories authored by Leblanc, there have been countless plays, radio shows, TV series and films, from Italian pornos