Skip to main content

Mobile Ads

Euphoria Season 2 review: Zendaya's cult HBO show is the most effective when it's thoughtful, not explicit

Euphoria, the famed HBO series that often feels like the raunchier, unhinged cousin of Netflix’s Sex Education had been on hiatus for around two years.

An unlikely cult hit, the first season became the stuff of legend for how casually it hyper-sexualised teenage life within the frameworks of a fantastical but ultimately explicit visual language. In between the first and second seasons, the show even released to standalone episodes to respond to near global clamour for biting into something that has always dripped with bloody, violent energy.

The second season resumes where the first left off with Rue, Jules and the gang in Los Angeles navigating the aftermath of an explosive first season that established the show as simultaneously one of the bleakest and most beautiful things on television.

We return in this new season with a New Year’s Eve party with a surprised deep-dive into the unlikely breakout star of the series, Fezco, Rue’s reluctant drug dealer played by an ethereal and often un-ironically hilarious Angus Cloud. One of the great things about Euphoria is how it teases conflict in the most stylized, unconcerned ways possible. And yet it can also be the weakness of the show, overemphasizing its capacity to visually stay ahead of its audience.

The first episode is evidence of both, wanting to be a thrifty noir but ultimately submitting to its music-video like aesthetics. Fezco confronts Nate, the poisonous male centre of a show that largely deals with the trauma of young women. Nate has also come close to Cassie in a needless soapy intertwining of threads that a show so unconventional could have done away with.

The second season introduces new characters like Dominic Fike’s benevolent drug abuser Eliott, who becomes an accomplice in Rue’s relapse, and new arcs like the unlikely warmth between Fezco and Lexi, a Beauty and the Beast-kind of reconciliation of life’s two extremes. On the face of it, plenty is happening in the second season, but because Euphoria has always wanted to kick the bucket in terms of dressing, a lot of it can feel scandalous and explicit for the sake of it.

In one scene, Nate’s abusive father calls out his family with his penis hanging out. It is audacities like this that often make it hard to reaffirm Euphoria as some hyper-sensualised vision of teenage hell. Everyone is a nightmare and their own worst enemy in this series, and sometimes their deep-seated psychological handicaps can feel like ammunition for the camera, rather than thought for the script or the story. 

While a lot of the second season feels like a doubling down on the shock and angst of the first, there are some standout episodes that are reminders of just how moving the series can be when it wants to be serious rather than just provocative.

Rue, played by the terrific Zendaya in a career-defining role, brings the house down in the fifth episode that is shrill, vicious, and almost too painful at times. Rue’s relapse has been victim of the show’s artificial poetic until this point but in the fifth episode, the prickly antique wrapped in gloss tears open its insides, and the result is almost too disturbing and affecting. Zendaya guts the screen in a maximised portrayal of tragedy slowly becoming a person. It is cacophonous, difficult, and almost too disconcerting.

Compared to the fifth episode, Lexi’s high school play, that makes up the entire seventh episode, is both whimsical and messy. As the play walks us through Lexi’s window-seat view of having watched the people around her confronting inexplicable lives, there is a belated sprinkling of the fairy-tale optimism that every now and then reaches out to those dismembered by the ask of the show’s world. 

Euphoria has always been stunningly performed but it has, in the process of embellishing its visual heights, often sunk to grasp at narrative lows to keep its chaotic chain of thought moving. In this second season, the show struggles to take forward arcs like that of Rue and Jules, and undefinable characters like Nate who remain fascinating but are beginning to look shallow for a lack of clear direction other than the motivation to cursorily offend.

The show can often become too gratuitous and self-serving in its allegorical version of heaven where all forms of pleasure also come cursed with a form of pain. Nate somewhat redeems himself in this second season but is restricted from embracing any form of essentiality. It is almost as if the show cannot decide if any of its characters can now be allowed to grow and graduate out of the chaos they create for themselves. Or whether they should be consigned to the elasticity of fate, that any future is simply some small cosmetic version of the present. 

While the inability of the show to merge good writing into a perversely stylised environment emerges as its biggest flaw in the second season, Euphoria remains fascinating even in the many ways it walks, leaps, and falls short. Because it does so with sincerity, with hard-boiled conviction that though it might be a weakness, is also the reason why the creative choices of the show have pillared its unsubstantiated but inevitable growth. It can often feel like an aggregation of literary quotes, but even their individual, disconnected beauty, they can overwhelm.

It is never going to be a weekend watch nor a show you would want to return to again and again, but by god is it transformative, nuclear, in the loudest, most unobscured of ways possible. 

Euphoria Season 2 is streaming in India on Disney+ Hotstar.

Manik Sharma writes on art and culture, cinema, books, and everything in between.

Read all the Latest NewsTrending NewsCricket NewsBollywood News,
India News and Entertainment News here. Follow us on FacebookTwitter and Instagram.


by Manik Sharma

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Watch The Sound with Mark Ronson Apple TV+ explores the curious link between music and technology

In The Salmon of Doubt , Douglas Adams writes: “I've come up with a set of rules that describe our reactions to technologies: 1. Anything that is in the world when you’re born is normal and ordinary, and is just a natural part of the way the world works. 2. Anything that's invented between when you’re 15 and 35 is new and exciting and revolutionary, and you can probably get a career in it. 3. Anything invented after you're 35 is against the natural order of things.” Cut to the world of music. As much as technology has been a driving force in the industry, the advent of any innovation has often been received with skepticism before it goes on to become the norm. Harnessing that interplay between the creative process of making music and the technological enhancement given to said music, is acclaimed DJ and producer Mark Ronson. In his just-released six-part mini-docuseries Watch the Sound with Mark Ronson , he astutely defines how different the process of creating a great

Studying women presidents and prime ministers on screen, from Meryl Streep in Don't Look Up to Dimple Kapadia in A Thursday

In 2016, when I heard Hillary Clinton had lost the US Presidential race to Donald Trump, I took it as a confirmation that this is how much the US hated its women. And I felt temporarily gratified to live in a country which elected a woman as its third prime minister. This was before I remembered Indira Gandhi was the only woman prime minister we have had, and she was an outlier. Her strong and uncompromising leadership style skews meaningful analysis of gender representation in governance. Anyway, for all the breaking of paths and glass ceilings, trailblazers like Gandhi and Iron Lady Margaret Thatcher commonly belong to conservative or traditional parties. Left to the simultaneously imaginative and mimetic art of comedy, the first woman US president looks like Meryl Streep’s Janine Orlean in Don’t Look Up and Julia Louis Dreyfus’ Selina Meyer in the HBO show Veep . They are both are anti-feminists and women of power. Yet they could not be more different in how they reflect the r

Netflix's Lupin acknowledges dangers of fantasies of omnipotence, introducing viewers to a socially conscious gentleman thief

By Emma Bielecki Netflix’s immensely successful new French-language show Lupin has introduced a new generation of anglophone viewers to one of the most popular characters in French popular fiction, Arsène Lupin, gentleman thief. Lupin was created in 1905 by the writer Maurice Leblanc at the behest of publisher Pierre Lafitte, who had recently launched a general interest magazine, Je Sais Tout . Lafitte wanted a serial that would guarantee a loyal readership for his magazine, as the Sherlock Holmes stories had for the Strand Magazine. Drawing inspiration from Conan Doyle and EW Hornung’s Raffles stories, Leblanc obliged by creating a flamboyant and ultimately always benign trickster figure. Cat burglar, con artist, master of disguise, Lupin is also a brilliant detective and righter of wrongs. His appeal has proved enduring: in addition to the original 20 volumes of stories authored by Leblanc, there have been countless plays, radio shows, TV series and films, from Italian pornos